Traumatic effects for children removed from their caregiver by the Administration for Children Services. Part 3


According to Child Welfare Information Gateway (n.d), governments have put into place various legislations to mitigate the impacts of Administration for Children Services. These legislations and policies govern the process of offering substantial care to the vulnerable children and adequately administering their care. The Child Abuse Prevention and treatment Act was incorporated to ensure sustainable welfare of all children. Klain and White (2013) stated that these legislations and polices has led to the improvement of the wellbeing and safety of children whoa are in short term foster care. They also contain legal aspects that address welfare of juveniles, their health and education. This is something that everyone could do for the world, so could you write essay for me? This post is like an essay about my attitude to the government. Lets do this together!

Various provisions are stipulated in the policies that are linked to the emotional and social welfare of the children under foster care. Provisions and opportunities in current policies linked to social and emotional welfare include: State Plan for Child Welfare Services (Section 422 of the Social Security Act), Section 422(b)(15) that obliges child welfare organizations to cultivate, in partnership with and in consultation with qualified healthcare personnel for the continuing oversight and direction of health care facilities, as well as psychological health services, for any child in adoptive care settlement. Mental Health Service plans for these children need to contain an explanation of how Federations will provide the services to those in foster care. Furthermore, States may possibly address the psychological health of children who have gone through maltreatment in accordance to provisions of the Act. A case in point, time-limited family reconsolidation amenities in Promoting Safe and Stable Families clearly contain mental health services in the Social Security Act (Worth, 2011).

Early and Periodic Diagnosis, Screening, and Assessment (EPSDT) are a typical Medicaid subsidy for youth and children, into their health plans. EPSDT guarantees that youngsters receive suitable medical, hearing, vision, and dental check-ups to detect and treat any complications as quickly as possible. It also comprises of mental fitness valuations and facilities. Since they are definitely qualified for Medicaid, all kids in foster care fit for title IV-E compensation are eligible to EPSDT (Adams, 2004).

Screening and Treatment of Trauma: Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act of 2011 entails that organizations need to contain in their plans an explanation of how they will check for and treat sensitive trauma related with ill-treatment and removal for infants in foster care (section 422(b)(14)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act) (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau, 2015). Ascertaining the symptoms exhibited by youth when they arrive is acute for the developing of a treatment plan. It is similarly vital to have a comprehensive trauma history for every child. Even though children come to the care of the system because of a detailed allegation of abuse, cruelty and neglect are chronic in nature (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2007). Child health personnel ought to have a sympathetic understanding of the numerous forms and frequencies of trauma children have faced, outside just the happening that triggered child welfare participation. Piloting wide-ranging practical assessments according to an unvarying program can aid caseworkers and overseers estimate whether or not treatment approaches are employed to cut children’s symptoms. Countries can contemplate assimilating trauma screening into the systematic screening actions conducted under EPSDT to meet the new condition (Worth, 2011).

Still, are these policies efficient? We do not disagree that the motive behind removal of children from parental care is positive, but the removal process is in itself traumatic. Yes, the process is necessary at times. Think of a case involving a physically disabled child taken away to specialized care. It enhances their education and improving their living standards, but anxiety fills their minds as well. ‘Must I leave home? Why is my condition necessitating so many procedures? Can’t I be assisted at the comfort of our home? Why is daddy/mommy allowing me go through this?’ This in itself leaves them with tremendous traumatic stress.

Training for both parents directly attached to the children and for professionals outside child welfare such as court personnel, private agencies, welfare agencies, guardians, and adoptive parents is critical because of sensitivity of the stage of development. It is important to give caregivers guidance on how to talk to talk to these children (Lawrence, Carlson & Egeland, 2006). At their early stages, under the age of six, children require full attention and understanding. Staff needs to be training on how to interpret body language, behavior and emotions of the children they care for because at age below 5 years, the children have not fully developed their communication systems (Perry et al., 2015). It might be a challenge to express their feelings. Not unless the caregiver is keen in noting behavior changes and body language they may misinterpret these feelings (Reiser-Danner, 2003).


Children in care are especially susceptible to childhood traumatic stress. Administrations for Children Welfare Systems, hence, are obliged to address their needs by treating not only the symptoms of the trauma but also the principal causes. A comprehensive tactic includes raising awareness, using authenticated screening and evaluation methods, provision of trauma specific mediations, engaging all participants in the recovery procedure. Shifting the structure’s emphasis to trauma informed practices improve results for affected children and relatives. Implementing of the recommendations and proposals in this brief will allow interested parties to foster specialized techniques and strategies to make sure children in care are capable of healing from past trauma and cultivate skills necessary to form resilience. Various policies and legislations have been passed to ensure that such children are given utmost care by the organizations taking their responsibility. With appropriate treatment and upkeep, they can draw on their capacity for flexibility and overcome the undesirable effects of trauma.